Can Personal Injury Attorneys Recover the Cost of Investigators and Process Servers? Here’s What California Law Allows
- paulwright7
- Dec 9, 2025
- 4 min read

In personal injury litigation, cases often stall not because of legal issues—but because the defendant simply cannot be found or is actively avoiding contact. When that happens, attorneys rely on investigators and skilled process servers to locate the defendant, complete service, and apply the pressure needed to bring the insurance carrier back to the negotiating table.
A common question among PI firms is: "Can we recover the cost of hiring a private investigator or process server?"
The answer: Yes—under most litigation circumstances. Below is a clear breakdown of when these costs are recoverable, how courts treat them, and why these services are considered essential to advancing a PI case.
1. After a Lawsuit Is Filed, Cost Recovery Becomes Available
Once a complaint has been filed, investigators and process servers fall under California’s recoverable litigation expenses.
California Code of Civil Procedure §1033.5(a) explicitly allows recovery of:
(4) Service of process fees
(2) Investigator expenses that are “reasonably necessary to the conduct of litigation”
This is the legal foundation PI attorneys rely on.
Courts routinely approve costs for:
Multiple service attempts
Skip tracing required to locate the defendant
Investigative work that makes substituted service possible
Surveillance or stakeouts when they are reasonably tied to service
Due diligence declarations
Documentation needed for motions for alternative service
These expenses become part of the Memorandum of Costs, recoverable if the plaintiff prevails.
2. Investigator and Service Fees in Default Judgments
When a defendant is served but fails to respond, the attorney proceeds with a default judgment. This is one of the most straightforward scenarios for cost recovery.
Courts almost always approve:
Process server fees
Skip trace charges
Service-related investigative work
Due diligence reports and declarations
Reasonable surveillance or attempts
Documentation required to support substituted service
These costs become part of the default judgment and may be collected from the defendant.
3. Recoverability After Trial or Arbitration
If the case proceeds to trial and the plaintiff wins, investigative and process-serving fees become part of the prevailing party costs, which the defendant is responsible for paying.
Recoverable costs at this stage include:
Standard service of process
Difficult service requiring investigation
Skip tracing or witness location
Documentation of attempts
Substitute service efforts
The key is that these actions must be reasonably necessary to the litigation—and properly documented.
4. When the Case Settles (The Most Common Outcome)
Even though most PI cases settle, attorneys can still recover investigative and service costs—just not from the insurance carrier directly.
Instead, California contingency agreements allow attorneys to treat these expenses as case costs, meaning:
The attorney pays the investigator during case handling
The cost is deducted from the client’s gross settlement
The attorney’s overhead remains unaffected
For PI firms, this is a crucial point:
Using an investigator does not reduce the attorney’s profit—it simply moves the case forward.
This is one of the reasons PI litigators regularly use skip tracing, surveillance, and high-difficulty service. The firm gains leverage without incurring financial loss.
5. Why Documentation Matters for Cost Recovery
Courts and insurers rely heavily on documentation. A professional investigator provides:
Time-stamped attempt logs
Photographs and video when applicable
Complete due diligence declarations
Narrative investigative reports
Compliance with CCP service rules
This documentation not only supports cost recovery but also strengthens substitute service motions, trial preparation, and overall negotiation leverage.
6. The Strategic Advantage for PI Firms
Hard-to-serve defendants often halt a PI case at the most critical phase—when the attorney needs to file, serve, and move into litigation.
A skilled investigator helps PI firms:
Overcome access barriers (gated homes, secure buildings, restricted communities)
Locate defendants who have moved, concealed their address, or are actively avoiding service
Trigger litigation deadlines that force insurers to take the case seriously
Avoid dismissal for failure to serve
Strengthen settlement positioning by showing the defense the plaintiff is prepared
Serving the defendant is frequently the turning point in a PI case.
7. The Exception: Pre-Litigation Costs
Before a lawsuit is filed, the rules are different.
Pre-litigation investigative work is generally not recoverable from the insurance company or opposing party.
This includes:
Initial skip tracing
Surveillance before filing
Attempts at voluntary service
Pre-litigation fieldwork
Because there is no active case yet, courts cannot award costs.
However…
Even though these expenses aren’t recoverable, they often unlock the entire case by allowing the attorney to:
Confirm identity and address
Successfully serve once the lawsuit is filed
Push the claim into litigation
Force insurers to reevaluate a lowball offer
This makes pre-litigation investigative work strategically valuable, even if not reimbursed.
Final Takeaway
✔ Attorney recovery of investigator and process-serving costs is available in most litigation scenarios.
✔ Costs are routinely awarded in defaults and judgments.
✔ Costs become part of prevailing party fees in trial wins.
✔ Costs are deducted from settlements without affecting attorney overhead.
✔ Pre-litigation costs are the exception—but often critical for case momentum.
Partnering with a licensed Private Investigator who understands PI litigation gives firms the ability to move stalled cases forward, protect deadlines, increase negotiation leverage, and position clients for better outcomes.
If your case has halted because the defendant is missing, evading, or unreachable, we can help you get it moving again.
info@rushintel.com 626-385-8662
Comments